Google vs Bing indexed, per site · pulled 17 Jul 2026 · Google = URL Inspection (exact for young sites, sampled for money sites) · Bing = Webmaster API, every URL (exact). Bing submission dates shown per row.
Every not-indexed page is one of these. Telling them apart is the whole game.
Google never crawled it. Fixable.
Google crawled it and declined. Harder.
1 · Money sites (MI, MHQ, peptide, fundbiz) — indexed 95–100% on Google. Stop indexation effort; the constraint is ranking, not indexing. Only open item: fundbiz’s Bing gap, now clearing automatically.
2 · Bing-absent mids (ltd 5%, mortgageexplained 10%, trustedinteriors 0%) — likely never verified in Bing WMT. Verify registration + key, then the agent (now serving young sites first) feeds them.
3 · Google discovery (adhdhelper, vettedhome, homesandhedge…) — internal-link cascades from indexed hubs (no clicks from you) + a daily Request-Indexing paste list (clone merchanthq_daily_indexing.py).
4 · Discovered-not-indexed (babydata, trustedinteriors) — authority + linking, not Request Indexing. babydata is low-value AdSense → likely leave.
Open decision: point scarce daily Request-Indexing clicks at commercial sites (mortgageexplained, vettedhome, trustedinteriors) before low-value adhdhelper / fitcalcs.
adhdhelper (your question): not a penalty — pure discovery on a zero-backlink young site. The one GSC “noindex” flag is /site-index/, correctly excluded. · kartapay excluded (paused). · Google %s are 20-URL sample extrapolations; Bing counts are exact per-URL.